[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: depth of the operation vs. depth of the WC

From: Rui, Guo <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:42:14 +0800

> > I implemented it more for the sake of non-'svn' clients doing various
> > operations with the reporter. I figure we can build in "exclude"
> > capability to wc-ng. (And it would be fine to implement it in the
> > current wc model too, similarly to "absent" directories.)
What does wc-ng means? A re-design to libwc? I found a document in notes
directories for it, but not yet read it.

> Er, and also you're right that this is pretty important for the
> deselection interface when you're deselecting a child of something
> that isn't depth-empty (or a directory child of something that is
> depth-files).

Maybe I'll try to bring in the depth-exclude in my deselection design if
there is still enough time after I've done with existing depth values.
Anyway, this is another story and is not in my plan yet. :-)

Rui, Guo

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-04 19:42:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.