Re: [PATCH]Can we accept JavaHL Revison.Number.Number(-1)?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Well, that's fine, if there's a need for it. I'm against promoting an
> API for the sake of promoting an API, though. Looking back at your
> proposed JavaHL API, is there a reason why you need to add an API to
> JavaHL? Why can't you use info() to get the revision numbers you are
> interested in, and do the youngest v. HEAD comparisons in a wrapper?
>

Yes info() helps!. Thanks.

> It's possible that I don't fully grasp what you are trying to do here.

I am trying to convert svn_opt_revision_t to svn_revnum_t in JavaHL.

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH67fF3WHvyO0YTCwRAkqvAJ49iBrqcICR2/32fDc3S3c5EHr4LACfYI6M
v5OgMcil9v8msEAf9VgS7jA=
=pvjm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-27 16:06:23 CET