[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: how issue-2897 branch solves reflective merges?

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:39:33 -0800

On Jan 11, 2008 8:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net> wrote:
> > Could we redo this to be FSFSy? Or does this require SQLite? -- justin
> >
> It uses sqlite.

Thanks, but that wasn't quite the question I was asking. =)

I'm not in favor of having SQLite as a dependency if at all possible,
so let me rephrase the question:

While the current implementation obviously uses SQLite, are the
algorithms used dependent upon relational features only present in
SQL? If not, then can we rewrite the algorithms using a flat-file
index or something similar?

I'm not suggesting that you have to do that work before it gets merged
to trunk, but I guess a number of us (hi dglasser) would like to
remove SQLite if we can.

The other question that I meant to ask is:

What is blocking issue-2897 branch from being merged to trunk?

Thanks. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-11 17:39:46 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.