[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: validate_eol_prop_against_file() inefficiency?

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-12-28 22:33:26 CET

On Dec 28, 2007 1:13 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> While updating the svnbook, I noticed something odd. In Subversion 1.4,
> when you try to set svn:eol-style on a binary file, you get the obvious error:
> % svn pset svn:eol-style CRLF suse.png
> svn: File 'suse.png' has binary mime type property
> In trunk, however, you get something far more bizarre:
> % svn pset svn:eol-style CRLF suse.png
> subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c:2425: (apr_err=200009)
> svn: File 'suse.png' has inconsistent newlines
> subversion/libsvn_subr/subst.c:736: (apr_err=135000)
> svn: Inconsistent line ending style
> I see that libsvn_wc/props.c:validate_eol_prop_against_file() has been
> ordered differently in trunk. What I can't figure out is why the
> far-more-expensive newline consistency check was moved ahead of the
> super-cheap is-binary check? Besides being really inefficient, the new
> error is just not as clear.
> Was this fallout from the URL propsetting support or something?

Not sure, but wasn't there also a patch recently to add validation of
the eol-style values? Perhaps that is when this happened.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 28 22:33:36 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.