David Glasser wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 4:38 PM, Mark Phippard <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 23, 2007 3:41 PM, David Glasser <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> There's definitely still work to be done on 1.5, but progress has
>>> slowed from lots of people committing like haywire to a smaller number
>>> of people focusing on a few specific tasks. At the same time, people
>>> (especially new developers who can't vote on backports anyway) are
>>> eager to start working on new features, and we're already having
>>> issues where features like Issue 2723 are getting committed and then
>>> having bugs. I think we can move to branch mode soon.
>>> I propose we branch 1.5.x as soon as cmpilato's mergeinfoless-copies
>>> branch is merged to trunk.
>> I was thinking the same thing. +1.
>> Although the change Kamesh and Karl have been working on should also
>> be included. I suspect they will merge first, but if not I would
>> propose that we branch after they merge.
> Hmm, I amend my proposal to "when there are no outstanding
> short-term-branches-from-trunk", which basically means cmpilato's and
Mine's merged to trunk now! Apologies to all developers doing merges
against our 1.4.x server. The speed will be ... suboptimal. (If I had a
way to ask a server, "Hey, do you support merge-tracking?" we could fix that
C. Michael Pilato <email@example.com>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Sat Nov 24 21:24:59 2007