Re: Proposal: Branch 1.5 after cmpilato merges his branch to trunk

On Nov 23, 2007 4:38 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 3:41 PM, David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net> wrote:
> > There's definitely still work to be done on 1.5, but progress has
> > slowed from lots of people committing like haywire to a smaller number
> > of people focusing on a few specific tasks. At the same time, people
> > (especially new developers who can't vote on backports anyway) are
> > eager to start working on new features, and we're already having
> > issues where features like Issue 2723 are getting committed and then
> > having bugs. I think we can move to branch mode soon.
> >
> > I propose we branch 1.5.x as soon as cmpilato's mergeinfoless-copies
> > branch is merged to trunk.
>
> I was thinking the same thing. +1.
>
> Although the change Kamesh and Karl have been working on should also
> be included. I suspect they will merge first, but if not I would
> propose that we branch after they merge.

Hmm, I amend my proposal to "when there are no outstanding
short-term-branches-from-trunk", which basically means cmpilato's and
Kamesh's.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org