On Nov 24, 2007 3:24 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
>
> David Glasser wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2007 4:38 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 23, 2007 3:41 PM, David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net> wrote:
> >>> There's definitely still work to be done on 1.5, but progress has
> >>> slowed from lots of people committing like haywire to a smaller number
> >>> of people focusing on a few specific tasks. At the same time, people
> >>> (especially new developers who can't vote on backports anyway) are
> >>> eager to start working on new features, and we're already having
> >>> issues where features like Issue 2723 are getting committed and then
> >>> having bugs. I think we can move to branch mode soon.
> >>>
> >>> I propose we branch 1.5.x as soon as cmpilato's mergeinfoless-copies
> >>> branch is merged to trunk.
> >> I was thinking the same thing. +1.
> >>
> >> Although the change Kamesh and Karl have been working on should also
> >> be included. I suspect they will merge first, but if not I would
> >> propose that we branch after they merge.
> >
> > Hmm, I amend my proposal to "when there are no outstanding
> > short-term-branches-from-trunk", which basically means cmpilato's and
> > Kamesh's.
>
> Mine's merged to trunk now! Apologies to all developers doing merges
> against our 1.4.x server. The speed will be ... suboptimal. (If I had a
> way to ask a server, "Hey, do you support merge-tracking?" we could fix that
> right quick-like.)
svn_ra_has_capability or something. I think we even already made one
for mergeinfo.
--dave
--
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 25 03:35:32 2007