[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS performance concerns.

From: Charles Acknin <charlesacknin_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-31 11:00:09 CET

On 10/30/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> I don't have a beefy notebook, no, but when one operation performs 60x
> better on BDB versus FSFS on the same notebook, the problem ain't hardware.
> Besides that, I've been keeping mirrors of the Subversion repository (if
> not via svnsync, at least tar+ssh, for ages, and know that performance used
> to be much better than this.

I think using tools like valgrind/callgrind could help to work out
runtime performance issues. It will tell right away which functions
the program spent most time in, and thus you should be able to easily
catch the one(s) that you're interested in when comparing callgrind
outputs of BDB and FSFS.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 31 11:00:22 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.