[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS performance concerns.

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2007-10-30 21:45:46 CET

I haven't seen any results suggesting that sharding will have much of an
impact on svn performance proper.

Usually these bad performance results suggest some kind of complexity
explosion in the back-end code, of the general form "we're opening all
of the rev files between 1 and N for each step of the history trace."
No way to figure out what's actually wrong without going in with a
debugger.

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:41 -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > What in the world has happened to FSFS in 1.5?!
>
> Did you reshard the local FSFS repo? If not, perhaps you should try and
> see how that affects the timing...
>
> John
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 30 21:50:32 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.