Re: FSFS performance concerns.

John Peacock wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I did not. But then again, the repository on svn.collab.net is not
>> sharded
>> either, and yet outperformed my local repository by an order of
>> magnitude,
>> even where a network -- HTTP even -- was in the mix.
>
> Yeah, but unless you have a *really* nice notebook, I suspect the
> collab.net server is a little beefier. Plus, you didn't say anything
> about what OS/filesystem you are running locally.

I don't have a beefy notebook, no, but when one operation performs 60x
better on BDB versus FSFS on the same notebook, the problem ain't hardware.
 Besides that, I've been keeping mirrors of the Subversion repository (if
not via svnsync, at least tar+ssh, for ages, and know that performance used
to be much better than this.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand