[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS performance concerns.

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-10-30 21:55:03 CET

John Peacock wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I did not. But then again, the repository on svn.collab.net is not
>> sharded
>> either, and yet outperformed my local repository by an order of
>> magnitude,
>> even where a network -- HTTP even -- was in the mix.
> Yeah, but unless you have a *really* nice notebook, I suspect the
> collab.net server is a little beefier. Plus, you didn't say anything
> about what OS/filesystem you are running locally.

I don't have a beefy notebook, no, but when one operation performs 60x
better on BDB versus FSFS on the same notebook, the problem ain't hardware.
 Besides that, I've been keeping mirrors of the Subversion repository (if
not via svnsync, at least tar+ssh, for ages, and know that performance used
to be much better than this.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Tue Oct 30 22:03:08 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.