[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should we maintain the backward comaptiblity with Subversion Operational Logging?

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-06-26 15:53:16 CEST

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:02:06AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I think Kamesh is saying that there are two routes we might takes with this
> logging stuff:
> - add new items at the ends of their respective lines, as a sort of
> backwards-compat attempt
> - have revisions always be at the ends of lines, for more consistent
> parsing

Ah, right. I like the third option: add new items in the most logical
place for the operation in question so that the logs remain readable.

I haven't done any logs analysis with the SVN operation logs, but I
would have thought that anything non-trivial would need to deal with the
different formats of the different commands anyway, so a semi-common log
format doesn't seem that attractive to me. YMMV (and like I said, I'm
not actually trying to do this).


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Jun 26 15:52:55 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.