Re: [PATCH] Build both serf and dav

On 6/18/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> I find talking about DAV in Subversion complicated now because "dav" might
> mean "ra-dav" or it might mean "communication using the DAV protocol" (which
> includes ra_serf).
>
> If we can do so in a way that's not horrendously disruptive, +1 on renaming
> libsvn_ra_dav to libsvn_ra_neon.

What are the backwards compatibility issues here? Would it be
required that somehow svn 1.5 would have to be able to link against
something called libsvn_ra_dav if we changed the name?

If not, this would be pretty straightforward.

If so, it would also not be too hard to make
ra_loader.c(load_ra_module) look first for libsvn_ra_neon and then for
libsvn_ra_dav.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org