Mark Phippard wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:
>> Well, depending upon the usage, we could be constructing a bunch of them
>> every time the date is needed.
>>
>> How about setting the date field to null upon construction for the new
>> constructor and then when it's first requested, we calculate the date
>> and cache it.
>>
>> Here's a patch that does that.
>>
>> I realized that the part of this patch that changes everything but the
>> LogMessage is safe to commit, so I'll probably do that shortly. The
>> change the LogMessage can be separate, depending upon what we decide
>> here.
>
> That is a good point. I would go ahead with the new patch.
Committed in r24625.
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 18 03:36:27 2007