Re: [PATCH] javahl using microsecond time in LogMessage
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Blair Zajac wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> >On 4/17/07, Blair Zajac <email@example.com> wrote:
> >>Well, depending upon the usage, we could be constructing a bunch of them
> >>every time the date is needed.
> >>How about setting the date field to null upon construction for the new
> >>constructor and then when it's first requested, we calculate the date
> >>and cache it.
> >>Here's a patch that does that.
> >>I realized that the part of this patch that changes everything but the
> >>LogMessage is safe to commit, so I'll probably do that shortly. The
> >>change the LogMessage can be separate, depending upon what we decide
> >That is a good point. I would go ahead with the new patch.
> Committed in r24625.
I reviewed this today, looks good!
Received on Fri Apr 27 03:20:56 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev