Re: [PATCH] javahl using microsecond time in LogMessage

On 4/17/07, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:
> Well, depending upon the usage, we could be constructing a bunch of them
> every time the date is needed.
>
> How about setting the date field to null upon construction for the new
> constructor and then when it's first requested, we calculate the date
> and cache it.
>
> Here's a patch that does that.
>
> I realized that the part of this patch that changes everything but the
> LogMessage is safe to commit, so I'll probably do that shortly. The
> change the LogMessage can be separate, depending upon what we decide here.

That is a good point. I would go ahead with the new patch.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org