Max Bowsher wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Blair Zajac wrote:
>>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>>> Daniel Rall wrote:
>>>>>> Sure, I don't mind. Mucc is already functional, I just wanted it
>>>>>> to get more visibility since it is a useful tool.
>>>>> How about improving its documentation and linkage in our web site's
>>>>> files? And/or adding a blurb about it to the next version of the
>>>>> Subversion book?
>>>> Oh, it's going in the book. Don't you worry about that... ;-)
>>> Good to hear! I do think we should consider renaming it though, svnmucc
>>> or svn-mucc.
>> And maybe moving from contrib/ to tools/ ?
>
>
> Do we want it in tools/? At the moment, nothing in tools/ is installed
> by default. If mucc is to truly be a full-fledged Subversion command,
> I'd think it better for it to move to subversion/svnmucc/ - and I think
> it is useful enough to support this.
Michael made the point that if we do this, then we *really* have to
support it, even after the svn shell comes out.
This is a middle step between leaving it where it is and moving it into
subversion/.
Regards,
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 28 00:48:25 2007