Re: Promoting mucc to a full fledged tool

Blair Zajac wrote:
>>> And maybe moving from contrib/ to tools/ ?
>>
>> Do we want it in tools/? At the moment, nothing in tools/ is installed
>> by default. If mucc is to truly be a full-fledged Subversion command,
>> I'd think it better for it to move to subversion/svnmucc/ - and I think
>> it is useful enough to support this.
>
> Michael made the point that if we do this, then we *really* have to
> support it, even after the svn shell comes out.
>
> This is a middle step between leaving it where it is and moving it into
> subversion/.

Do we intend that it be installed with "make install"?

If we do not, then many people won't have easy access to it.

If we do, then I think it would be bad to support it any less than
everything else we "make install".

I don't think mucc is that complex, or indeed, that different from the
main command line client, that supporting it forever (well, until 2.0)
would be an undue burden.

Max.