[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Promoting mucc to a full fledged tool

From: Max Bowsher <maxb1_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2007-03-28 01:37:12 CEST

Blair Zajac wrote:
>>> And maybe moving from contrib/ to tools/ ?
>> Do we want it in tools/? At the moment, nothing in tools/ is installed
>> by default. If mucc is to truly be a full-fledged Subversion command,
>> I'd think it better for it to move to subversion/svnmucc/ - and I think
>> it is useful enough to support this.
> Michael made the point that if we do this, then we *really* have to
> support it, even after the svn shell comes out.
> This is a middle step between leaving it where it is and moving it into
> subversion/.

Do we intend that it be installed with "make install"?

If we do not, then many people won't have easy access to it.

If we do, then I think it would be bad to support it any less than
everything else we "make install".

I don't think mucc is that complex, or indeed, that different from the
main command line client, that supporting it forever (well, until 2.0)
would be an undue burden.


Received on Wed Mar 28 01:37:32 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.