Re: Promoting mucc to a full fledged tool
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Blair Zajac wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Daniel Rall wrote:
>>>>> Sure, I don't mind. Mucc is already functional, I just wanted it
>>>>> to get more visibility since it is a useful tool.
>>>> How about improving its documentation and linkage in our web site's
>>>> files? And/or adding a blurb about it to the next version of the
>>>> Subversion book?
>>> Oh, it's going in the book. Don't you worry about that... ;-)
>> Good to hear! I do think we should consider renaming it though, svnmucc
>> or svn-mucc.
> And maybe moving from contrib/ to tools/ ?
Do we want it in tools/? At the moment, nothing in tools/ is installed
by default. If mucc is to truly be a full-fledged Subversion command,
I'd think it better for it to move to subversion/svnmucc/ - and I think
it is useful enough to support this.
Received on Tue Mar 27 23:23:45 2007
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev