Re: Promoting mucc to a full fledged tool

Blair Zajac wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Daniel Rall wrote:
>>>> Sure, I don't mind. Mucc is already functional, I just wanted it
>>>> to get more visibility since it is a useful tool.
>>> How about improving its documentation and linkage in our web site's
>>> files? And/or adding a blurb about it to the next version of the
>>> Subversion book?
>>
>> Oh, it's going in the book. Don't you worry about that... ;-)
>
> Good to hear! I do think we should consider renaming it though, svnmucc
> or svn-mucc.

And maybe moving from contrib/ to tools/ ?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand