Re: Promoting mucc to a full fledged tool
Blair Zajac wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Daniel Rall wrote:
>>>> Sure, I don't mind. Mucc is already functional, I just wanted it
>>>> to get more visibility since it is a useful tool.
>>> How about improving its documentation and linkage in our web site's
>>> files? And/or adding a blurb about it to the next version of the
>>> Subversion book?
>> Oh, it's going in the book. Don't you worry about that... ;-)
> Good to hear! I do think we should consider renaming it though, svnmucc
> or svn-mucc.
And maybe moving from contrib/ to tools/ ?
C. Michael Pilato <email@example.com>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Tue Mar 27 19:38:48 2007
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev