I'll take a look-see later today.
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Ping...
>
> Has anybody had a chance to review Bill's patch? If nothing happens
> with it, I'll attach it to issue 2663.
>
> Thanks,
> -Hyrum
>
> William Nagel wrote:
>> On Feb 4, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Karl Fogel wrote:
>>
>>> A comment on the code: you've made the 'indentation' parameter
>>> to print_tree() have a new meaning. The doc string for that function
>>> should change to reflect this.
>> ...
>>
>>> Also, please provide a log message with your patch :-).
>> I fixed the doc string for print_tree, as per your suggestion, and
>> created a log message.
>>
>> A new patch for issue 2663, as well as the log message are attached.
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Fix issue #2663: Added a --non-recursive (-N) option to svnlook.
>>
>> * subversion/svnlook/main.c
>> (options_table): Add an element for the non-recursive option.
>>
>> (cmd_table): Add -N as a valid option for the tree command.
>>
>> (svnlook_opt_state): Add a boolean for storing the non-recursive state.
>>
>> (print_tree): Add a non_recursive parameter. Add a check against the
>> non_recursive and indentation parameters to short-circuit recursion into the
>> tree when non_recursive is true.
>>
>> (do_tree): Add a non_recursive parameter, and passed it through to the
>> print_tree call.
>>
>> (subcommand_tree): Pass non_recursive state to do_tree.
>>
>> (main): Handle -N option.
>>
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/svnlook_tests.py
>> (test_non_recursive): New test case to exercise -N option.
>
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Wed Feb 28 21:36:54 2007