[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status -u --xml

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-02-12 19:25:26 CET

Any output on stderr would tell you a path is not under version
control.

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jason Pyeron wrote:

> Unless you need a way to determine that it is not under svn control?
...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Rall [mailto:dlr@collab.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 13:12
> To: Jason Pyeron
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: svn status -u --xml
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> >
> > Option #2 is much better for XML since it is "proper" as an empty document
> > is not valid XML as it must always have a root node.
>
> Yup -- why I listed it. However, given that it's an error condition
> to call 'status --xml' or 'info --xml' on a local path which is not a
> WC, I hesitate to suggest that we attempt to produce meaningful output
> as well as error output. Rather, "don't do that".

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Feb 12 19:25:43 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.