Unless you need a way to determine that it is not under svn control?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Sr. Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:dlr@collab.net]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 13:12
To: Jason Pyeron
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: svn status -u --xml
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> Option #2 is much better for XML since it is "proper" as an empty document
> is not valid XML as it must always have a root node.
Yup -- why I listed it. However, given that it's an error condition
to call 'status --xml' or 'info --xml' on a local path which is not a
WC, I hesitate to suggest that we attempt to produce meaningful output
as well as error output. Rather, "don't do that".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 12 19:17:39 2007