Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL.

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2006-10-06 23:55:36 CEST

"Garrett Rooney" <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:

> Is that hash table actually accessed from multiple threads? The vast
> majority of our code consists of data structures that are not shared
> among more than oen thread...

Good point. On the other hand, given that it's only a single
iterator, simply using pool avoids the question now and in the future.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Fri Oct 6 23:55:52 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Garrett Rooney: "Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL."
Previous message: Daniel Rall: "Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL."
In reply to: Garrett Rooney: "Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL."
Next in thread: Garrett Rooney: "Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL."
Reply: Garrett Rooney: "Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]