Re: [PATCH] why not loop through apr_hash_t with pool as NULL.

On 10/6/06, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> writes:
>
> > Found a snippet of code in subversion/libsvn_fs_base/tree.c where we
> > create a separate subpool which is passed to apr_hash_first alone. And
> > this subpool can be replaced by NULL.
>
> Not thread safe.

Is that hash table actually accessed from multiple threads? The vast
majority of our code consists of data structures that are not shared
among more than oen thread...

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 6 23:25:17 2006