Re: Objection to change in svn_depth_t component naming (r21067)
From: Max Bowsher <maxb1_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2006-08-15 15:13:05 CEST
Karl Fogel wrote:
Sorry, I was unclear. I didn't mean to compare the two standards.
> We happen to be unusually familiar with DAV, but that's
Yes, but these are developer-visible terms, are they not? So, falling in
> How about "fulltree", btw?
It doesn't address my complaints about "base" or "exact", whilst
Moreover, let me clarify my position: I am opposed to using various
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.