[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Objection to change in svn_depth_t component naming (r21067)

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_google.com>
Date: 2006-08-15 02:55:45 CEST

Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> writes:
> All-in-all, I'd much rather we stuck with the established DAV
> standard, and ignored the LDAP terminology completely.

Why would we assume that the DAV standard is more "established" than
the LDAP one? We happen to be unusually familiar with DAV, but that's
probably just a local bias...

How about "fulltree", btw?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 15 02:56:31 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.