[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.4.0-rc2 tarballs up for testing/signing

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2006-07-16 10:40:45 CEST

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:35:05AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> >have no issues reported on list. But, in my mind, it's certainly okay
> >to issue an 'early' RC that has *some* known issues that we fix up
> >before the next RC. So, there's no need to have each RC be perfect
> >and to have that hold up the release candidate being tested in other
>
> Let me clarify my tenses. I mean that if we find an issue within an
> hour or even a day after a RC has been rolled, we don't re-roll just
> for that one problem. If we did that, we'd be constantly re-rolling
> RCs for every minor bug and I view that as a waste of everyone's time.

In general, +1. However, in this case, I can't even build the rc2
package!

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jul 16 10:41:15 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.