D.J. Heap wrote:
> On 6/26/06, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
>> D.J. Heap wrote:
>> > Any objections or comments (more pythonic style, etc) to this patch?
>> >
>> > Log:
>> > Allow BDB support to be optional on Win32.
>> All right, but why limit that to the BDB back-end? If you do this, do it
>> for all FS back-ends.
>>
>> -- Brane
>
>
> Mostly because I don't use BDB and it's been asked for by others
> several times as well...and that's how the unix build works, isn't it?
> Or is any backend optional in the unix build?
Theoretically, it is. The loader implementation is symmetrical (as are
the #defines, as you saw). If course, in practice, fsfs doesn't bring
any external dependencies ...
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 26 17:53:08 2006