Re: [PATCH] Build on Win32 without BDB

On 6/26/06, Branko Èibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
> D.J. Heap wrote:
> > Any objections or comments (more pythonic style, etc) to this patch?
> >
> > Log:
> > Allow BDB support to be optional on Win32.
> All right, but why limit that to the BDB back-end? If you do this, do it
> for all FS back-ends.
>
> -- Brane

Mostly because I don't use BDB and it's been asked for by others
several times as well...and that's how the unix build works, isn't it?
 Or is any backend optional in the unix build?

DJ
Received on Mon Jun 26 17:50:52 2006