David James wrote:
> On 6/5/06, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@comcast.net> wrote:
>> > I've also unsuccessfully sent patches for this issue to David Summers
>> > (whom I'm also copying in) but I didn't realize the .spec sources were
>> > in the "official" repository. You may have better luck submitting a
>> > new patch directly to this list with [PATCH] in the subject (making
>> > sure it still applies cleanly to the latest trunk), although I don't
>> > know if anyone else would be willing to apply the patches.
>>
>> Hmm. Maybe David's swamped right now? His work on this up to now has
>> been
>> very helpful, providing RPM's and SRPM's for i386 architecture. My
>> patch is
>> on
>>
>> > If no one is still willing to apply your patch then I will offer to
>> > host the corrected SRPMs and RHEL-4 64 bit binaries myself, but of
>> > course getting this bug fixed in the trunk would be preferable.
>>
>> My latest patch is at:
>>
>>
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/558/x86_64.patch
>>
>
> Hi Nico,
>
> I'm not terribly familiar with the syntax for RPM spec files, but I
> looked at your patch and it seems quite reasonable and useful.
> Assuming that your patch is required to compile the RHEL-4 binaries on
> x86_64, and that it does not cause any problems on other
> architectures, it seems like it is definitely a good idea to commit it
> and backport to 1.3.x.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> Toby, can you test Nico's patch and confirm that it
>
I assume you meant to finish this sentence with "confirm that it
compiles", so yes, I'll confirm it tonight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 5 21:17:45 2006