[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Agggh! 64-bit bug still present in 1.3.2 (PATCH already in issue tracker)

From: David James <djames_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-06-05 19:40:50 CEST

On 6/5/06, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@comcast.net> wrote:
> > I've also unsuccessfully sent patches for this issue to David Summers
> > (whom I'm also copying in) but I didn't realize the .spec sources were
> > in the "official" repository. You may have better luck submitting a
> > new patch directly to this list with [PATCH] in the subject (making
> > sure it still applies cleanly to the latest trunk), although I don't
> > know if anyone else would be willing to apply the patches.
> Hmm. Maybe David's swamped right now? His work on this up to now has been
> very helpful, providing RPM's and SRPM's for i386 architecture. My patch is
> on
> > If no one is still willing to apply your patch then I will offer to
> > host the corrected SRPMs and RHEL-4 64 bit binaries myself, but of
> > course getting this bug fixed in the trunk would be preferable.
> My latest patch is at:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/558/x86_64.patch

Hi Nico,

I'm not terribly familiar with the syntax for RPM spec files, but I
looked at your patch and it seems quite reasonable and useful.
Assuming that your patch is required to compile the RHEL-4 binaries on
x86_64, and that it does not cause any problems on other
architectures, it seems like it is definitely a good idea to commit it
and backport to 1.3.x.



Toby, can you test Nico's patch and confirm that it

David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 5 19:41:25 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.