Vincent Starre wrote:
> Read a few messages up. This thread is not "CVS's way is better", this
> is "limitations of the current system and how they might be improved".
> There should probably be a blanket ban on even mentioning CVS in this
> thread :)
I would disagree with that sentiment. From the beginning Subversion has
been advertised by the designers as being the "replacement for CVS".
Very little rational discussion of Subversion features can happen
outside the context of existing CVS features. Granted, this will
diminish over time, and eventually will not be the case (when no one can
remember CVS anymore! :) But there are still a lot of folks out there
using CVS and considering Subversion - they DO care about feature
compatibility between Subversion and what they currently use.
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 20 20:43:42 2006