Re: [PATCH] svn diff -r1:BASE URL asserts

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2006-03-10 10:39:38 CET

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:02:09PM +0000, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> [long rambling email]

Okay, perhaps that wasn't too clear. In summary:

* I don't think a BASE:WORKING diff is pegged, because by definition
  theres no history-tracing to do. However...
* I don't mind if we just call the pegged version of diff unconditionally,
  as long as we pass a peg-revision of svn_opt_revision_unspecified for
  the BASE:WORKING case.

The latter currently isn't well-defined, though I'm just about to go
off and fix that, making the diff (and possibly merge; I've not checked)
functions more like the rest of the functions in libsvn_client.

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 10 10:40:51 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] [DOCFIX] Fix ambiguous comments for svn_string_isempty()"
Previous message: Christopher Mann: "SWIG bindings not makeing on Subversion 1.3.0, SWIG 1.3.28 or 1.3.24 and Python 2.4"
In reply to: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] svn diff -r1:BASE URL asserts"
Next in thread: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] svn diff -r1:BASE URL asserts"
Reply: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] svn diff -r1:BASE URL asserts"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]