Re: [PATCH] svn diff -r1:BASE URL asserts

I'm not properly awake yet :) Let me try that again:

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:39:38AM +0000, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:02:09PM +0000, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> > [long rambling email]
>
> Okay, perhaps that wasn't too clear. In summary:
>
> * I don't think a BASE:WORKING diff is pegged, because by definition
> theres no history-tracing to do. However...
> * I don't mind if we just call the pegged version of diff unconditionally,

where possible (i.e., only in the single-path case)

> as long as we pass a peg-revision of svn_opt_revision_unspecified for
> the BASE:WORKING case.
>
> The latter currently isn't well-defined, though I'm just about to go
> off and fix that, making the diff (and possibly merge; I've not checked)
> functions more like the rest of the functions in libsvn_client.

though we will still need different functions, as the _peg versions only
take a single path.

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 10 10:58:21 2006