[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r18656 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr libsvn_wc

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-03-09 19:38:01 CET

"Ivan Zhakov" <chemodax@gmail.com> writes:
> r18656 is second part of implementation. Is r18628 I've implemented
> check for file modifications in simple case using stream translation,
> in r18656 I've have implemented for harder cases (when md5
> verification also required). So how I should mark these revisions
> better way? Is it enougn mention in second part (r18656) that it is
> completes work started in r18628?

I would modify both log messages, each to point to the other. r18628
would say "This is the first part of work completed in r18656.", and
r18656 would say "This is the completion of work begun in r18628.".

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 9 21:26:30 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.