Re: svn commit: r18656 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr libsvn_wc

"Ivan Zhakov" <chemodax@gmail.com> writes:
> r18656 is second part of implementation. Is r18628 I've implemented
> check for file modifications in simple case using stream translation,
> in r18656 I've have implemented for harder cases (when md5
> verification also required). So how I should mark these revisions
> better way? Is it enougn mention in second part (r18656) that it is
> completes work started in r18628?

I would modify both log messages, each to point to the other. r18628
would say "This is the first part of work completed in r18656.", and
r18656 would say "This is the completion of work begun in r18628.".

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 9 21:26:30 2006