[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r18656 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr libsvn_wc

From: Ivan Zhakov <chemodax_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-03-09 09:57:21 CET

On 06 Mar 2006 13:42:44 -0600, kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net> wrote:
> zhakov@tigris.org writes:
> > Author: zhakov
> > Date: Wed Mar 1 05:46:49 2006
> > New Revision: 18656
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/include/svn_io.h
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/questions.c
> >
> > Log:
> > Complete use stream translation API to check for file modifications.
>
> Is this a completion or follow-up of r18628? If so, can we mark both
> revisions' log messages to indicate this?
>
r18656 is second part of implementation. Is r18628 I've implemented
check for file modifications in simple case using stream translation,
in r18656 I've have implemented for harder cases (when md5
verification also required). So how I should mark these revisions
better way? Is it enougn mention in second part (r18656) that it is
completes work started in r18628?

--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Thu Mar 9 13:14:32 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.