Re: svn commit: r18656 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr libsvn_wc
On 06 Mar 2006 13:42:44 -0600, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> email@example.com writes:
> > Author: zhakov
> > Date: Wed Mar 1 05:46:49 2006
> > New Revision: 18656
> > Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/include/svn_io.h
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/questions.c
> > Log:
> > Complete use stream translation API to check for file modifications.
> Is this a completion or follow-up of r18628? If so, can we mark both
> revisions' log messages to indicate this?
r18656 is second part of implementation. Is r18628 I've implemented
check for file modifications in simple case using stream translation,
in r18656 I've have implemented for harder cases (when md5
verification also required). So how I should mark these revisions
better way? Is it enougn mention in second part (r18656) that it is
completes work started in r18628?
Received on Thu Mar 9 13:14:32 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev