Re: svn commit: r18656 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr libsvn_wc
On 09 Mar 2006 12:38:01 -0600, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> "Ivan Zhakov" <email@example.com> writes:
> > r18656 is second part of implementation. Is r18628 I've implemented
> > check for file modifications in simple case using stream translation,
> > in r18656 I've have implemented for harder cases (when md5
> > verification also required). So how I should mark these revisions
> > better way? Is it enougn mention in second part (r18656) that it is
> > completes work started in r18628?
> I would modify both log messages, each to point to the other. r18628
> would say "This is the first part of work completed in r18656.", and
> r18656 would say "This is the completion of work begun in r18628.".
Received on Fri Mar 10 16:19:25 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev