[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r18637 - branches/1.3.x-svnmerge.py/contrib/client-side

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: 2006-02-28 03:26:59 CET

Max Bowsher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> blair@tigris.org wrote:
>
>>Author: blair
>>Date: Mon Feb 27 14:02:58 2006
>>New Revision: 18637
>>
>>Modified:
>> branches/1.3.x-svnmerge.py/contrib/client-side/svnmerge.README
>> branches/1.3.x-svnmerge.py/contrib/client-side/svnmerge.py
>> branches/1.3.x-svnmerge.py/contrib/client-side/svnmerge.sh
>> branches/1.3.x-svnmerge.py/contrib/client-side/svnmerge_test.py
>>
>>Log:
>>Merge in all changes in trunk to all the svnmerge* files starting from
>>r17139, which was the last revision merged into the 1.3.x branch.
>>This will bring the 1.3.x branch up to match trunk.
>
>
> If this is a straightforward update, then why use a merge branch at all?
>
> Merge branches are only required when conflicts would occur.

I didn't want to list at least 27 revisions in the STATUS file :)

This makes it easier to merge in.

I could have listed in the STATUS file to merge all revisions from r17139 to
HEAD at the time for all those files, but we don't seem to do that. We list
revisions for many files, not entire revision ranges for several files.

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<blair@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 28 03:27:45 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.