Greg Stein wrote:
>
> For something like version control, I would tend to think slower
> cycles also, and would support a six-month cycle. What kind of
> confidence can we give people if we are continually making new
> releases. "Woah? What was wrong with the last one? They're making a
> new release again?!"
>
> Though hearing from "real" admins like Lieven, that can certainly
> alter that viewpoint.
Ok, if that's a request for more input from admins, I'll pitch in. I'm
the svn admin for my company, and I'm eagerly awaiting 1.4 for the wc
improvements -- they'll be a big win for all of our developers. I'm
less interested in serf; we're currently using neon, and definitely
experiencing performance pain with it, but I plan to alleviate that pain
by getting svnserve access to our repositories set up within the next
month, so serf won't be a big win for us.
While 6 months seems to me to be the sweet spot for minor releases, IMO
the current state of trunk is ripe for an exception to that rule.
- Marc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jan 28 16:16:16 2006