[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion/Neon License question

From: Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming_at_digium.com>
Date: 2006-01-27 20:18:46 CET

Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
>>On 1/26/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I had to fill out a document at work that just listed open source software
>>>we were using along with the licenses. I was surprised when I looked up
>>>the license for Neon to see that it is GPL.
>>
>>Where did you see that? The neon homepage
>>(http://www.webdav.org/neon/) says *Library* GPL, not GPL.

Also note that the FSF would _really_ prefer this language to stop being
used; the official name of that license is now the Lesser General Public
License, not 'Library'. There _is_ a 'Library General Public License',
but its use is strongly discouraged.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 27 20:19:14 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.