Re: Subversion/Neon License question

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
> > I had to fill out a document at work that just listed open source software
> > we were using along with the licenses. I was surprised when I looked up
> > the license for Neon to see that it is GPL.
>
> Where did you see that? The neon homepage
> (http://www.webdav.org/neon/) says *Library* GPL, not GPL.
>
> The license in the tarball is the LGPL too, sitting in src/COPYING.LIB.
>

The Neon test suite is GPL licenced: it's possible that the Neon
package that Mark is using incorporates the test suite, in which case
the aggregation would be covered under the GPL, even if the library isn't.

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 26 18:45:38 2006