[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Date ordering of revisions [was: fsfs bug in commit timestamps?]

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-01-17 18:30:50 CET

On 1/17/06, Peter N. Lundblad <peter@famlundblad.se> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Julian Foad wrote:
>
> > Tony Overfield wrote:
> > From that message:
> > > While committing a long-running commit, if a shorter commit is started
> > > and completed before the long-running commit has finished, it creates
> > > unordered svn:date properties.
> > [...]
> > > I am using Windows XP with:
> > > svn, version 1.2.3 (r15833)
> > > compiled Aug 19 2005, 23:10:39
> >
> > Thanks for reporting it here now. It sounds like that's the bug found and
> > fixed recently (in trunk r18078) that's specific to FSFS; Berkeley DB
> > repositories don't have that bug.
> >
> > The fix does not appear to have been back-ported to the 1.3.x or 1.2.x
> > releases. I suggest we propose it for both. Yes, other committers?
> >
> +1. It is trivial.

FWIW, I just nominated the patch for 1.3.x, feel free to add your
votes to STATUS ;-)

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 17 21:29:43 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.