[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Date ordering of revisions [was: fsfs bug in commit timestamps?]

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-01-17 02:34:27 CET

On 1/16/06, Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Tony Overfield wrote:
> > I should have been more persistent, but I previously reported
> > this to the users list.
> >
> > See "Unordered commit dates from ordinary commits",
> >
> > http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-09/0599.shtml
> From that message:
> > While committing a long-running commit, if a shorter commit is started
> > and completed before the long-running commit has finished, it creates
> > unordered svn:date properties.
> [...]
> > I am using Windows XP with:
> > svn, version 1.2.3 (r15833)
> > compiled Aug 19 2005, 23:10:39
> Thanks for reporting it here now. It sounds like that's the bug found and
> fixed recently (in trunk r18078) that's specific to FSFS; Berkeley DB
> repositories don't have that bug.
> The fix does not appear to have been back-ported to the 1.3.x or 1.2.x
> releases. I suggest we propose it for both. Yes, other committers?

At the very least it should be backported to 1.3.x, 1.2.x probably
also makes sense. I hadn't proposed it yet because I wanted to give
people time to object if there was something wrong, but if you feel
it's ready feel free to put it in STATUS.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 17 02:47:28 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.