On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
>
> > potentially public route, I don't think the amount of sharing is large
> > enough to require that, and so I'd be happy to put more shared stuff
> > in libsvn_fs which is simpler in the short term, as long as we keep
> > our eyes open for the point when it starts to get unreasonably complex
> > and do the refactoring then.
> >
...
> I'm fine with the circular dependency. The error stuff can move into
> libsvn_fs, as can the svn_fs_*__canonicalize_abspath(). I caution
> against futzing with anything but such low-hanging fruit.
>
How would that work on Windows? Currently, we only have a circular
dependency regarding struct definitions. We can't have it on functions (or
other symbols). We could do a hack like wrapper_template.h in libsvn_ra,
but I like to avoid such if possible.
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 2 15:34:24 2005