Re: [PATCH]: Trying to get rid of iconv dependency on windows

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:18:42PM +0200, Stefan Küng wrote:
> And I don't think it's an argument to prevent this patch from going in,
> if you can't even tell under *what* circumstances these functions are
> broken.
>

You're right, sorry, that was a pretty pointless post, wasn't it? (I
blame the cold I've got at the moment).

One quick question: If I remember correctly, the Win32 functions will fill
up an output buffer completely if the buffer is too small, without a null
terminator. I'm not familiar with the APR functions - do they do the same?

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 13 11:12:44 2005