Re: pre-revprop-change hook problems

On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:56:34AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Granted, if no user is available, perhaps we should call the hook with
> "anonymous" as the 3rd argument, or something...? That would be

I would have thought the current (intended) behaviour was correct -
we're calling the hook with a blank 3rd argument. Unfortunately, I'm
guessing that apr_proc_create can't run a (program? batch file? only on
Windows?) with a blank argument, which is causing the other arguments
to shift into that position.

Is anything else (other than the author field in hook scripts, that is)
likely to be affected by this problem?

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 28 16:37:42 2005