Re: Branching for 1.3.

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Here are some things that had been discussed for 1.3 in the past, but
> which I doubt will make it into 1.3:

Does the keywords-as-hash patch that both Max and I have worked on fall into
this category too? The last thread I see was from Max on 6/12, and then nothing
(I know he got caught up in other things and I certainly fell off the face of
the earth for a while); it looks like Julian was reviewing:

        http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-06/0407.shtml

If Max's part 1 can get reviewed/committed, I can quickly knock out the other
pieces according to the original plan:

> 1. include & libsvn_subr
> 2. libsvn_wc
> 3. libsvn_client
> 4. cmdline client & tests

Please don't let another release go by without getting this in (I don't think I
could take the disappointment ;-) when there seemed to be a distinct lack of
controversy over it.

TIA

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org