[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Branching for 1.3.

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-09-20 07:51:58 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> Basically, a few hours to resync/retest and add some warning
> docstrings (because, for now, we'll have to maintain the list of valid
> admin directory names in two places, yuck). I'll try to get this in by
> Friday. If not, merging the patch to the release branch should be a
> minor thing, even though it's a mess to have to vote on it.

IMHO we should just branch, then, and merge it in afterwards.
Shouldn't be too hard to get 3 +1's for something like that.

> (Heh, just yesterday I played with the idea oif using " svn" instead
> of "_svn". It works, but I suspect it'd be a bit too far out -- and
> impossible to document clearly in the book. :)

*Somebody* smoked his breakfast this morning, clearly.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 20 08:57:43 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.