Re: [PATCH] wc-replacements branch: Another test for issue 2135
From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-09-07 19:50:10 CEST
On 9/6/05, Ivan Zhakov <email@example.com> wrote:> On 9/5/05, Erik Huelsmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:> > Hi Ivan!> >> > I had your mail marked, but there's no patch attached ....> Sorry, I forget it. Check now:> [[> Add test for issue 2135 (bug in reverse merge when replacing a file)> It is like merge_file_replace (in merge_tests.py), but reverts file> instead of commit.> > * subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/revert_tests.py> (revert_file_merge_replace_with_history): New test for issue 2135.> (test_list): Add revert_file_merge_replace_with_history test and mark> it with XFail.> ]]> > > > PS: should I apply to trunk or to wc-replacements? If it works on> > trunk - as XFail - I should probably apply to trunk...> I don't know policy about XFail tests, but now it fails on> wc-replacements and trunk.> > > > On 9/5/05, Ivan Zhakov <email@example.com> wrote:> > > Hi!> > >> > > There is another test for issue 2135.> > >> > > [[> > > Add test for issue 2135 (bug in reverse merge when replacing a file)> > > It
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.