Re: [Conclusion] Subversion 1.3 distribution tar slimmer?

Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 9/1/05, nick vajberg <nickvajberg@yahoo.dk> wrote:
>
>>>>My reaction to that is to try 1.3-RC1 without and
>>>>see what happens. We
>>>>can always switch to maxb's plan in 1.3-RC2.
>>>>Bye,
>>>>Erik.
>>
>>I haven't followed the discussion, but if this means
>>the SVN distro is even less self-contained, well, then
>>this sucks.
>>
>>It is already hard enough to install svn on a clean
>>linux distro.
>
>
> Why? Most of them supply subversion packages by now.

I think the key is that most of them provide obsolete versions of
Subversion, HTTPD, etc., and that not all Linux developers keep on
the bleeding edge (at least not for build systems and servers, for
which LSB compatibility and stability are the driving factors)

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products           mike at easysw dot com
Internet Printing and Publishing Software        http://www.easysw.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org